I'm not sure I can support the concept that someone's hobby is more important than someone else's livelihood. And I don't know that it's always a good idea to link monetary benefits to societal importance.
If we go down that path in this economy, it won't be long until we're making the same arguments when it comes to programs for special needs children vs. the larger school population. Or building access ramps at parks vs. new trails. Or paying for senior citizen programs vs. youth services.
The resource, in this case striped bass, belongs to everyone, whether that person is driving a Grady White or a trawler.
If and when the stock is healthy--and scientists can prove it--I don't see why commercial fishermen shouldn't get a bigger slice of the pie so consumers can enjoy fresh striped bass fillets at a restaurant or at local market.
But if the stock isn't healthy, we should be talking about adjusting recreational activity, starting with protecting the big, female fish and shutting down the senseless winter slaughter of 200,000 to 800,000 striped bass off the coast of Virginia and North Carolina.
Read more
Recent Comments