Comments On the “Sonar-like project brings new precision to fish counts” article from the Gloucester Daily Times, August 17, 2010, and posted on Ahab’s Journal and Saving Seafood.com
"The experimental approach — known as Ocean Acoustic Waveguide Remote Sensing, or OAWRS —expands by a factor of 'roughly one million', according to a peer-reviewed article in Science Magazine, the effectiveness of traditional trawl surveys, now the starting point for regulatory controls." (see above mentioned article by Richard Gaines in Gloucester Daily Times))
NOAA funding must be made available for the testing of this survey instrument. This is the kind of project that the "Fisheries Service" is mandated to spend money on, ---not junkets to Mozambique.
The research and testing of this survey technology would actually be of "Service" to the fisheries and the fish consuming public. Surely NOAA can take one million of its eight billion dollar budget and spend it on testing something that might benefit everyone, ---including the fish.
If NOAA was truly interested in fulfilling its purpose of promoting sustainable fisheries, and serious about restoring some belief in the veracity of its stock surveys and analyses, wouldn't you think funding would be automatic for such a promising and potentially important scientific innovation, ---and timely, since currently there is no trust in the integrity of the agency?
This is an opportunity for NOAA to try something different, to honor their incessantly proclaimed commitment to science-based regulation, and to abandon quoting the cartoon science of Pauly, Worm, Costello, et al. It's time for NOAA to quit the net-towed-sideways, stab-in-the-dark, stop-and-drop, trawl surveys, and let go the admittedly hyperbolic, agenda-driven, bogus junk they've been fostering and calling scientific data for too many years.
It is time for NOAA to pay attention to the sound science that is available from many of their own scientists and from the cooperative studies involving reputable fishing Captain Jim Rhule and The F/V Darana R. working with scientists from the NEAMAP Virginia Institute of Marine Technology program. NOAA seems to discount all but the results that can be “spun” into support for the avowed NOAA agenda formula of “overfishing” therefore “fleet reduction”.
Recent Comments